Wednesday, May 11, 2016

A bit of 'At Night' in New Orleans


8 comments:

  1. Craig....dont´t you think that the concert was short? for a cure show of course...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not at all. I said a few weeks back that I figured the sets would be roughly 2.5 hours.

      This is a massive tour, lasting months, 3 nights in a row & 5 nights a week sometimes. That can take a huge toll.

      When they were playing a few shows here and there, 10 or 12 shows a year spread out, the long shows are easier.

      I would think 3 hour shows will the exception on this tour, not the rule.

      Delete
    2. You are totally right....but we are always wanting more..aren´t we? Have fun tonight!! I wish you a chain of flowers in the set!

      Delete
    3. I think we Cure fans have gotten spoiled with these massive 3+ hour sets. 2.5 hours seems a lot more manageable for a tour this long.

      With a back catalogue of songs this huge, The Cure could be playing for 5 hours and people would still be disappointed that their favorite didn't get played.

      Also Craig, you got to see Burn live twice now. You lucky devil.

      Delete
  2. How i love "Seventeen seconds"! I really happy that will listen some of them live!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Absolutely loved the show!! Was not disappointed at all?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am, in a way, glad they do shows with 28 songs, so it's more special to hear some songs. Ofcourse it's great to hear 50 songs (mexico) but i think this kind of setlists are good for a big tour like this.

    I always liked the setlists of tours like Swing and Dream tour because they vary night to night, hoping this tour will be the same.

    ps: at night SOUNDS SO MUCH BETTER WITH KEYBOARD !!! THANK YOU ROGER !!!!

    ReplyDelete