Thursday, May 1, 2008

Finally! Official singles announcement

Check thecure.com. Finally updated with a press release about the singles. And some new info on the second single - it will be 'Freakshow' with 'All Kinds of Stuff' as the b-side. Strange that there is no mention of the release formats or the collector boxes (not true?). And even stranger, the official list of tour dates makes no mention of the May 28th show in San Jose (don't worry, probably just a mistake).

Update: There's a countdown clock and a sample of 'The Only One' on the front page of thecure.com. Also, Robert says he hopes that the new website will be up on May 13th.

52 comments:

  1. Finally as you say...Enough moaning has been posted but couldn't they update the front page?Freakshow in June...ABINK in July? Let's hope so...

    ReplyDelete
  2. But no mention of the double album. I'm losing faith here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "all kids of stuff" o rly?
    seriously though. yes about time. but still VERY excited.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love the new song. It's derivative of High - shamefully so - but whatever. It's catchy as hell and growing on me every second! I love The Cure. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. i'm sort of sad that those "new" songs from the european concerts are actually going to be the singles from this album. i mean, on the one hand, i've always liked cure album tracks much better than singles with a few exceptions, but these songs seem weaker than most.

    of course, i'll have to wait to hear studio versions (hopefully with re-written lyrics) before passing judgment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. anticipating bsides more then the singles. I just checked to see what seats were still available for Hollywood bowl and nothing comes up. Just last week there was a single seat mid way back in the center. Anybody know what (if any) shows are actually sold out?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Brandon - Hollywood Bowl and Austin, Texas are sold out. A few others are close.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hooray, this is all great news!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's cool to finally hear a (sample of a) studio version of the song. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, the studio version of High (Part 2) sounds a bit better than the live version.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Am I weird for not thinking that it sounds all that much like "High"? :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. No V, you're weird for OTHER reasons. : )

    ReplyDelete
  13. Okay, *that* I can deal with. :) Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  14. well, there goes my "re-written lyrics" hope.

    anyway, doesn't sound too bad at all. i rather like it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To me it sounds like a mix between WISH and THE CURE. Raw, but with a fun, pop-ish melody.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes,Great News, new singles, b-sides, new cd, new website ¡¡¡

    I don´t know what to think about that the first two singles are pop, reminds me of the Wish era.

    I think there must be a balance between doom and gloom and poppier stuff, but the most of CURE fans we surely prefer darker tunes.

    I do love upbeat songs but I wish an album as Disintegration. I think this is the right time for a new CURE album like that.

    In the meantime and while allthe doubts are resolved, there´s no much more to do than to feel EXCITEMENT and why not?, listen the sampler over and over again...until you love it.

    :-0 :-)

    ReplyDelete
  17. OT Comment

    Anybody else think that the Radio City Music Hall Tour closer gig on June 21 will become a live CD and filmed a' la SHOW?

    RCMH must really good acoustics, so good for a CD ....

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hurrrraaaah! A long-waited single is gonna be out at last! I really love it's sound & lyrics. Can't wait to hear the whole stuff!

    ReplyDelete
  19. on thecure.com home they drop the sample....could someone post it???
    I didn't hear it...Damn!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. It's still there: http://www.thecure.com/

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks, i get it with IE, With Firefox i get in The Play for today sample like before.....very strange.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Works in Firefox for me. Just try reloading the page.

    ReplyDelete
  23. "Also, Robert says he hopes that the new website will be up on May 13th."

    2008?

    ReplyDelete
  24. just the temps to delete...Ok with Firefox too.....i go to sleep now (it's 3 AM here)after hearing it 30/40 times...byeeeee

    ReplyDelete
  25. JPX - He didn't give the year, just the month and day. : )

    ReplyDelete
  26. Does anyone know if this is a worldwide release date??
    I live in Australia and I'm trying to decide whether to buy the singles online or get them in a store here.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I too like the sound of the new single. Does sound reminiscent of Wish-era singles.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Just from that little snippet, I've already got a lot more hope for this album that the last one. I think they realized the nu-metal approach, was the wrong approach. I know using Ross Robinson never sat well with Simon from the get-go.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The Only One is a good single choice, but Freak Show? No offense meant to Robert, but that's the weakest new song that they've been playing, and seems like a bad single choice. Oh, and the title of the b-side? Um, whether or not the song is good remains to be seen, but All Kinds of Stuff sounds like Robert was digging at the bottom of the barrel.

    ReplyDelete
  30. i like this a lot. i wasn't impressed at all with what i'd been hearing from recordings of the shows, but i think it sounds real good, even if it cops "high" a bit. at least it's solid.

    ReplyDelete
  31. its better then freakshow, yes. Maybe there should be a new poll. which song is worse, freakshow or friday im in love? does this mean that freakshow will be the next radio hit? or maybe that should be the new poll. will the cure ever have another radio hit? and by hit I mean make the billboard top 20.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Re:The artwork...looks good methinks...any thoughts on the face on the right hand side of the cover?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hey guys, I was dismayed to see that The Cure have an opening band this time around (at least in Boston). I've always hated having to wade through an opening band before the main even. Have any of you hear of "64days of static"? What's the deal?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Oops, I meant "65daysofstatic"

    ReplyDelete
  35. As i mentionned in my review of Copenhagen show on COF, go and see 65Days, they are excellent, and got better as the European tour went on....Easy reference would be Mogwai..They are a very friendly bunch too and play their music LOUD..Don't miss them , in my opinion..

    ReplyDelete
  36. Thanks, perfect.murder! I just checked out their official site and I'm intrigued.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Going back to the official announcement, i can't help but feeling dismayed that it is so impersonal..I mean, as the official The Cure website, do we need this........"2006 saw the Suretone/Geffen release of Festival 2005, an award winning 5.1 DVD featuring 30 songs, shot by fans, band members and professionals during the summer of 2005’s European festival run....(we've had to endure the advert for the last 2 1/2 years!!! thanks!)
    Or do we need being reminded of the Cure' 1976 origins???
    It is obviously a general press release,but i just think they could have made it more personal for their website..
    ....

    ReplyDelete
  38. i think the days are long gone when robert & the gang had anything to do with personalizing the website. too bad- i always enjoyed that.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I felt the same way, perfect.murder. It's so obvious that the band has little or nothing to do with the official site. I wonder if the band ever even looks at it? The fact that the Festival DVD advert was there for 3 years leads me to conclude that the site was essentially abandoned. I don't know what it would be like to be a busy rock star but I'd like to believe that I'd provide periodic updates to my website. I don't mean essays or anything much, but a simple, "Hi guys, we recorded some great stuff this week and I can't wait for you to hear it!" would at least enable my fans to know that I cared. As we've all said from time to time, Craig's site is the real "official" site.

    ReplyDelete
  40. AYE , see what happens when they sign to an american label?

    ReplyDelete
  41. ps; oh yeah ... festival 2005 wasnt out then ,, cant yer count? its only been just over a year

    ReplyDelete
  42. pps. ok well maybe two

    ReplyDelete
  43. NME.com has now got the story online, no news to add though

    ReplyDelete
  44. I saw that NME bit, but I think that's what Craig used for this post.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Pitchfork has a blurb about the new album, http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/news/50393-the-cure-herald-new-album-with-series-of-singles

    ReplyDelete
  46. I got to hear this live at Berlin and London and neither were that convincing but I have to say that the studio sample sounds excellent. I dont know how but Robert always manages to do things with his voice in studio that would give you goose pimples even on the popier tracks and Simons Bass Line sounds awesome.Im so looking forward to the album now.

    ReplyDelete
  47. That is why I've always felt The Cure's pop songs are always better on studio versions; same with the mellower sombre pieces like "Trust", "Apart", etc -- because Robert's vocals in studio can be subtle and he can do all kinds of high pitched, gorgeous singing. Live, he's exhausted and resorts to shouting to convey emotion, as he did on the 2004 album, which is why I hate Ross Robinson.

    Musically The Cure is good live, but vocally, it's far better on studio albums; that's true of virtually every band.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Better in the studio? Perhaps for some songs, but I can't agree that all of The Cure's songs sound better in the studio. The rendition that they did of All Cats Are Grey during the Toronto Dream Tour show was spellbinding, and Labyrinth during the Toronto Curiosa show, wow. It's a crime that the studio version of that song wasn't released as a single. It's arena rock at its' best.

    I agree, however, about From The Edge Of The Deep Green Sea. Both of the times that I've seen it played live, the band looked like they were just going through the motions, and didn't put much energy into it. Perhaps it'll be different now that Porl is back, because his work on Show was amazing. Note: I'm not meaning to take anything away from Perry with that statement.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I think the song snippet on the official site sounds very promising. Sure it sounds like "High Jr." but a nod to Wish-era Cure can't be a bad thing can it? I have no problem at all with a few poppy songs. Both Wish and Disintegration had pop elements and I rank them as the Cure's best two albums.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I've begun to have mixed feelings about the new song. It's just too shamelessly derivative. It's catchy, yes, and not bad at all - just so SAMEY. It's better than that counterfeit Cure song Taking Off, to be sure, but not better than EOTW, which I felt took the band in a slightly new direction. And Before Three was of course the best pop song on The Cure, and it's unfathomable to me that they did not release it as a single and instead released the abominable Taking Off and slightly less abominable alt.end.

    I do have hope for the album, though, beaause I'm pretty damn sure Robert will throw in some delicious dark songs. I do wish he'd just make a dark post-punk album, but I guess those days are over.

    On another note: I think WMS was the last truly experimental album the Cure will ever make. It's unfairly lambasted, methinks - it's much fresher than anything the Cure have done since. Bloodflowers is beautiful, don't get me wrong, but WMS is more innovative.

    ReplyDelete